Restoring from a Time Machine Backup Took Four Days!

6 11 2007

Recently, a data corruption event occurred on my Intel iMac. The computer would not boot. Luckily, it had Leopard installed, and it was being fully backed up with Time Machine. So, I decided to do a full restore of the entire disk using the Time MAchine backup.

The iMac has a 120GB hard disk containing about 100GB of data. Time Machine was backing up to an external 500GB hard disk over USB 2. To do a full restore of the computer from a Time Machine backup, you start up the computer using your OS X install disk. There is a menu item to restore from a Time Machine backup. Simply choose which backup you wish to use, and it begins, doing the rest automatically.

The progress bar started calculating the time remaining to complete the backup, and in a few moments it indicated… 170 hours to complete! Progress bar time estimates typically start conservatively, and tone down to be more accurate after a little while. It did, a little – to about 100 hours. This seemed startling – You can copy a 100GB disk using Disk Utility or SuperDuper in a tiny fraction of that time. But, having the time and curiosity, I let it run. It indeed took over 100 hours to complete the restore of 100GB of data.

Holy cow! Almost four days to restore a system from a Time Machine backup! The restore was successful, but if this hour-per-gigabyte rate is typical, it is something that needs improvement right away!

So, has anyone else had occasion to do a full restore of this kind? Did it take an incredibly long time, or was my experience an exception?


Actions

Information

16 responses

9 11 2007
lepton

As an experiment, I tried the very same restore again. Same computer and disks, same Time Machine backup. This time it took only three hours, a more normal time. What caused the difference? I don’t know, because it was the very same restore, as far as I can tell.

18 11 2007
Marc

I wonder if the USB connection somehow got downgraded to USB 1.1 – I can imaging the restore taking that long over a slow USB 1 connection, with the zillion files to write. glad to hear it was reasonable later using the same exact machine and backup set.

16 12 2007
Idetrorce

very interesting, but I don’t agree with you
Idetrorce

18 12 2007
Tim

I had a similar problem. The restore software told me that it would take 17 hours to restore my disk (about 30 gigs) which made absolutely NO sense to me. After digging around, I discovered that the USB 2 connection defaults to USB 1.1 when the drive is connected to my Mac at start-up. If I waited to plug the drive in just prior to the restore process, it connected as USB 2 and was much faster – about one hour restore time.

Tim

1 03 2008
Jac Dubois

Consider yourself lucky, Tim. I had to restore up a single application. The file size was 105 MB and Time Machine estimated the time to restore would be 17 hour! My external drive is connected via eSATA and an ExpressCard 34. I let it run overnight. The following morning, it was only about halfway completed. I canceled the restore process and found a workaround. An Applecare rep I spoke with was no help at all. He told me that this sort of performance is not unusual with Time Machine. Glad I didn’t have to do a full restore. Anyone know of a better backup solution?

28 03 2008
Marcin

Well,
I am now doing the system Restore over the air using the time capsule. I have around 130GB to restore. It took some time to let the TM RESTORE to calculate required disk space (about 30min) and then it estimated that it should take 14h which then increased to around 24. For now it is going a bit faster than the estimate says. I remember that it took around the same time to make the full backup (well, in the TM help it is said to leave the backup program over the night – quite honest, in my opinion), so I think it is quite ok and I decided to wait. I will see…

21 07 2008
nazri

Will everything be restored using the time capsule?
Applications and settings of everything at least?

21 07 2008
nazri

Ohh i posted my email wrongly. this is the correct one my bad. I read somewhere that logs and cache are not backed up i’m not really concern about that.

24 07 2008
Ohad Landedman

I am trying to restore my HD to a new one I just replaced on my MacBook, and the process via time capsule restore (over wifi, not USB) is around 50 hours. Holy molly! Does anyone have an alternative suggestion? Will I be better off connecting my old hard drive to the computer’s USB and restore from it that way? Do you know what is the right way to do it? Thanks.

26 07 2008
Jeff McMillan

Following Tim’s comment, I waited to plug in my external hard drive until after I had loaded the install disc and had selected the language. My 120GB restore took 2 or 3 hours.

21 08 2008
john

It’s because it was on USB. USB is unreliable in that way and can fluctuate it’s speed and transfer rates. Next time, try Firewire, if your drive has it (which it should, because every Mac user in history has a hard drive that has firewire).

10 12 2008
Wendi Whittles

I’m trying to do a full restore on a new hard drive using Time Capsule (wireless). I’ve waited several hours to get to the bar running saying that it’s restoring my applications and the time frame is a mere “less than a minute”. This has been going on for the past 3 hours. I’m a bit scared. Any idea what I should do?

13 12 2008
Andrew

I’m currently restoring my MacBook Pro after the 200 GB disk bit the dust and was replaced. I connected the Time Capsule via network cable and started the restore Thursday night but didn’t notice an estimate before I went to bed. The next morning it said 19 hours and when I got home from work it said 9 hours. It’s Saturday now and I’m about to hit the sack. All day it’s said “Transferring files to support applications, Less than a minute remaining”. Yeah right, I’m headed to four days myself (if I’m lucky.) Granted if I didn’t have the 500 GB TC (which set me back $300) I’d be paying a data restoration company $500 (at least) right now to restore my documents and I would still have lots of programs to reinstall. So using Time Machine with a Time Capsule pays for itself but I can’t wait till Apple invents a better, faster mousetrap.

13 12 2008
Andrew

I’m currently restoring my MacBook Pro after the 200 GB disk bit the dust and was replaced. I connected the Time Capsule via network cable and started the restore Thursday night but didn’t notice an estimate before I went to bed. The next morning it said 19 hours and when I got home from work it said 9 hours. It’s Saturday now and I’m about to hit the sack. All day it’s said “Transferring files to support applications, Less than a minute remaining”. Yeah right, I’m headed to four days myself (if I’m lucky.) Granted if I didn’t have the 500 GB TC (which set me back $300) I’d be paying a data restoration company $500 (at least) right now to restore my documents and I would still have lots of programs to reinstall. So using Time Machine with a Time Capsule pays for itself but I can’t wait till Apple invents a better, faster mousetrap.

9 04 2009
mare

So if you want a fast (full) restore of a drive I would go through the trouble of taking the drive out of the Time Capsule, putting it in a Firewire enclosure and attach it directly to your Mac.

I have a Airport with a seperate attached drive so for me it is easier, I just unplug the drive, walk 10 metres and plug it back in. Only worth it when you have a large amount to restore.

12 05 2009
correll

My 200 gb MacBook Pro had a bad logic board. Still under AppleCare but Apple also erased the hard drive. Luckily I have a Time Capsule. When I first started via wireless it said 50 hours remaining. I quit and plugged into the Time Capsule directly using an ethernet cable. It still said 24 hours remaining so I went to bed. When I got up 6 hours later is was finished. The back up was great, some logs and cache missing but nothing important. I use a wireless Time Capsule at home and a firewire drive at work daily. This was the first time I’ve ever needed it and it definitely was worth the investment.

Leave a comment